The Effect of Different Types of Prostate Biopsy Techniques on Post-Biopsy Infectious Complications

Abstract

Purpose:The aim of our study was to compare infectious complication rates between different prostate biopsy techniques with various number of biopsy cores.Materials and Methods:In this retrospective study, all patients from 2 hospitals who underwent prostate biopsy between 2012 and 2019 were identified. Cohorts with different types of prostate biopsies were compiled within these hospitals. Primary outcome measure was any registered infectious complication within 7 days post-biopsy. Secondary outcomes were infectious complications within 30 days, hospitalization and bacteremia. To compare the risk of infection following different prostate biopsy techniques, data was fitted into a logistic regression model adjusting for potential confounders.Results:In total, 4,233 prostate biopsies in 3,707 patients were included. After systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB; 12±1.4 biopsy cores), 4.0% (2,607) of all patients had infectious complications within 7 days post-biopsy. Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy (16±3.7 biopsy cores) was associated with significantly lower infection rates than systematic TRUSPB (adjusted OR: 0.29 [0.09-0.73] 95% confidence interval [CI]). Transrectal targeted MRI-ultrasound fusion guided prostate biopsy (3.1±0.8 biopsy cores) and transrectal targeted in-bore MRI guided prostate biopsy (2.8±0.8 biopsy cores) also showed fewer infectious complications than systematic TRUSPB (adjusted OR: 0.41 [0.12-1.12] 95% CI and 0.68 [0.37-1.20] 95% CI, respectively).Conclusions:Transperineal prostate biopsy, or transrectal prostate biopsy with reduced number of biopsy cores, could lower the risk of infectious complications.