Contemporary trends of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States

2Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Leadless pacemakers (LPM) have established themselves as the important therapeutic modality in management of selected patients with symptomatic bradycardia. To determine real-world utilization and in-hospital outcomes of LPM implantation since its approval by the Food and Drug Administration in 2016. Methods: For this retrospective cohort study, data were extracted from the National Inpatient Sample database from the years 2016−2020. The outcomes analyzed in our study included implantation trends of LPM over study years, mortality, major complications (defined as pericardial effusion requiring intervention, any vascular complication, or acute kidney injury), length of stay, and cost of hospitalization. Implantation trends of LPM were assessed using linear regression. Using years 2016−2017 as a reference, adjusted outcomes of mortality, major complications, prolonged length of stay (defined as >6 days), and increased hospitalization cost (defined as median cost >34 098$) were analyzed for subsequent years using a multivariable logistic regression model. Results: There was a gradual increased trend of LPM implantation over our study years (3230 devices in years 2016−2017 to 11 815 devices in year 2020, p for trend

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Khan, M. Z., Nassar, S., Nguyen, A., Khan, M. U., Sattar, Y., Alruwaili, W., … Munir, M. B. (2024). Contemporary trends of leadless pacemaker implantation in the United States. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 35(7), 1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16295

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free