Right versus left transthoracic approach for lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

18Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To compare the right and left transthoracic approach on the post-operative survival of patients with lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: Six hundred and ninety-five ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1990 and 2005 were retrospectively enrolled in the present study and were confirmed by histology to be of no lymph node metastasis. Those who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups, the left (n=545) and right (n=150) transthoracic groups. The follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 20years with a mean of 7years. Kaplan-Meier and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards were used for analysis. Results: 3- and 5-year CSS rates were 62.0% and 44.0% in the left group, while the corresponding figures in the right group were 56.0% and 40.0%(P<0.05). The overall survival for the two groups was significantly different (P=0.045). Survival analyses were stratified by stages, which found that the favorable survival advantage was not present. When the survival curves were stratified by tumor locations, a significant difference was not revealed. Surgical approaches were regarded as one of the prognostic factors in the univariate analysis (P=0.019). However, this significance could not be confirmed in multivariate Cox regression analysis (P=0.193). Conclusions: The left transthoracic approach is superior in some aspects to the right transthoracic approach regarding surgical and oncological outcomes in the treatment of lymph node negative ESCC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ma, Q., Liu, W., Long, H., Rong, T., Zhang, L., Lin, Y., & Ma, G. (2015). Right versus left transthoracic approach for lymph node-negative esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-015-0328-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free