Comparison of the capability of active and passive methods of boundary layer control on a low pressure turbine cascade

6Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper contains results of measurements conducted at the High-Speed Cascade Wind Tunnel of the University of the German Armed Forced in Munich, Germany, on a low pressure turbine cascade provided with several techniques of boundary layer control. Two types of passive turbulators consisting of a roughened surface and a backward facing step are compared with an active blowing on the profile suction side concerning their influences on the profile pressure distribution and the two dimensional losses in the midspan area. Data on the cascade performance are presented for steady and periodically unsteady inflow at various Reynolds numbers with a special focus on the low Reynolds number band. © 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ludewig, T., Niehuis, R., & Franke, M. (2010). Comparison of the capability of active and passive methods of boundary layer control on a low pressure turbine cascade. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, 112, 191–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14243-7_24

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free