Metals, air pollution, and health: Mosses to the rescue of epidemiology

3Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While evidence has accumulated about the links between long-term exposure to air pollution and health, little is known about the health effects of airborne metals. In France, the law makes it mandatory to monitor atmospheric concentrations and deposition of some airborne metals, through measurements or modelling. But the available data are either too scarce or irregular, making them difficult to use in largescale epidemiology: using mosses in the wild offers a welcome alternative. Mosses belong to the few vegetal organisms able to accumulate airborne metals. As such, they have been used for decades in air quality survey networks in Europe. They provide data to assess population exposure to airborne metals and may complement classical research programmes on air pollution epidemiology. As an example, we estimated associations between exposure to airborne metals of anthropogenic origin and increased mortality in France.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How can vegetation protect us from air pollution? A critical review on green spaces' mitigation abilities for air-borne particles from a public health perspective - with implications for urban planning

298Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Are grimmia mosses good biomonitors for urban atmospheric metallic pollution? Preliminary evidence from a french case study on cadmium

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Conceptual design and performance evaluation of an air-cushion floating purifier (ACFP) for improving air quality in semi-confined spaces

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meyer, C., Leblond, S., Jacquemin, B., & Lequy, É. (2020). Metals, air pollution, and health: Mosses to the rescue of epidemiology. Medecine/Sciences, 36(4), 376–381. https://doi.org/10.1051/medsci/2020062

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘24‘2500.751.52.253

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

80%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

40%

Environmental Science 1

20%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

20%

Sports and Recreations 1

20%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0