Knee disarticulation versus above-knee amputation

37Citations
Citations of this article
67Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

If below-knee amputation is impossible, knee disarticulation should be considered before above-knee amputation, regardless of age and etiology. Knee disarticulation which leaves the femur and patella untouched offers many advantages. The surgical technique is simple and non-traumatic since no bone or muscle tissue is to be dissected. The thigh muscles are completely preserved and thus there is no muscular imbalance. The stump permits total end bearing and its bulbous shape permits easy and firm attachment of the prosthesis. A specially designed double-wall socket and various types of knee joints are presented. Modern prostheses are superior to above-knee prostheses with regard to function, comfort and cosmesis. Results of 72 patients of all age groups are presented and discussed. © 1979, SAGE Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Baumgartner, R. F. (1979). Knee disarticulation versus above-knee amputation. Prosthetics and Orthotics International, 3(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.3109/03093647909164695

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free