Urinary NMR profiling in pediatric acute kidney injury—a pilot study

17Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill children and adults is associated with significant short- and long-term morbidity and mortality. As serum creatinine‐ and urine output-based definitions of AKI have relevant limitations, there is a persistent need for better diagnostics of AKI. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy allows for analysis of metabolic profiles without extensive sample manipulations. In the study reported here, we examined the diagnostic accuracy of NMR urine metabolite patterns for the diagnosis of neonatal and pediatric AKI according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) definition. A cohort of 65 neonatal and pediatric patients (0–18 years) with established AKI of heterogeneous etiology was compared to both a group of apparently healthy children (n = 53) and a group of critically ill children without AKI (n = 31). Multivariate analysis identified a panel of four metabolites that allowed diagnosis of AKI with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC-ROC) of 0.95 (95% confidence interval 0.86–1.00). Especially urinary citrate levels were significantly reduced whereas leucine and valine levels were elevated. Metabolomic differentiation of AKI causes appeared promising but these results need to be validated in larger studies. In conclusion, this study shows that NMR spectroscopy yields high diagnostic accuracy for AKI in pediatric patients.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

19Citations
28Readers

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muhle-goll, C., Eisenmann, P., Luy, B., Kölker, S., Tönshoff, B., Fichtner, A., & Westhoff, J. H. (2020). Urinary NMR profiling in pediatric acute kidney injury—a pilot study. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21041187

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 13

81%

Researcher 3

19%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 10

53%

Chemistry 4

21%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

21%

Computer Science 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0