Personality characteristics, preferences for rewards and the propensity to choose an auditing job

0Citations
Citations of this article
64Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates theoretical relationships among personality characteristics, preferences for different types of rewards and the propensity to choose a job in auditing by management-related higher education students. Specifically, the authors consider motivation, locus of control (internal and external) and self-efficacy (SE) as personality characteristics and financial, extrinsic, support and intrinsic as types of rewards. Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected through a questionnaire targeted at management-related higher education students in Portugal. Partial least squares structural equation modelling was used to analyse the data. Findings: The full sample results show that different types of motivation, locus of control and SE are related to different reward preferences. The authors also find a positive association between a preference for extrinsic rewards and the propensity to choose a job in auditing. Moreover, when the authors consider the role of working experience in the model, the authors find that the reward preferences that drive the choice of an auditing job differ according to that experience. Originality/value: This study enriches the literature by assessing preferences for different types of rewards, considering multiple personality characteristics and a comprehensive set of rewards. Furthermore, the authors identify the reward preferences that drive the choice of an auditing career. This knowledge empowers auditing firms to devise recruitment strategies that resonate with candidates’ preferences, which boosts the capacity of these companies to attract new auditors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alves, I., Gregório, B., & Lourenço, S. M. (2024). Personality characteristics, preferences for rewards and the propensity to choose an auditing job. Journal of Accounting and Organizational Change, 20(6), 56–84. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-04-2023-0080

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free