When the research design matters in EFL context: A case of different responses to open-response and closed-response questions on motivational orientation

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating and exploring the degree of motivational orientation (i.e. instrumental and integrative motivation) among sixty Iranian TEFL students. A survey research design was used to collect both quantitative and qualitative data, using a Likert-scale questionnaire containing six open-response items. Inferential analysis of quantitative data identified the subjects of the study with integrative orientation. However, descriptive analysis of open responses in terms of coded recurrent themes indicated contradictory results. In sum, the findings suggest a gap between Iranian TEFL students’ “desirable motivation” and “desired motivation”. The researcher attributes the contradictory results not only to the social context, but also to the type of questionnaire and the psychological status of respondents. Also, the findings provide support for other components of motivation other than just instrumentality and integrativeness, mainly “personal” aspects as proposed by Benson’s model of motivation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naeini, M. B. (2012). When the research design matters in EFL context: A case of different responses to open-response and closed-response questions on motivational orientation. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 1(6), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.6p.264

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free