Dosimetric impact of volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

background: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the toxicity and outcome of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients treated using 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DcrT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMaT) technique. Materials and methods: 68 patients treated between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. since 2009 patients received 3DcrT with 50/70 Gy to the elective/boost volumes in 35 fractions; from then, VMaT with simultaneous integrated boost (sIB) with 54.45/69.96 Gy in 33, or 54/66 Gy in 30 fractions. Induction chemotherapy was administered in 74% of the patients, concomitant cisplatinum in 87%. acute and late toxicity data, progression-free survival psF and overall survival Os, and toxicity correlations with dose metrics were reported. results: With a median follow-up of 64 months, complete remission at the last evaluation was in 68% of the patients, while 28% and 9% had locoregional relapse and distant disease, respectively. The 5- and 10-year progression free survival (pFs) rates were 62.7 ± 6.5% and 53.2 ± 8.7%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year Os rates were 78.9 ± 5.5% and 61.4 ± 9.2%, respectively. at the multivariate cox analysis TNM stage (p = 0.02) and concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.01) resulted significant for pFs, concomitant chemotherapy (p = 0.04) for Os. Improvements in acute toxicity were presented for VMaT patients due to its ability to spare Oars. Odds ratio (Or) for acute salivary toxicity, between VMaT and 3DcrT, was 4.67 (p = 0.02). Dosimetrically, salivary toxicity correlated with mean parotid dose (p = 0.05), dysphagia with laryngeal (p = 0.04) and mean oral cavity (p = 0.06) doses, when dose-volume histograms (DVhs) are corrected for fractionation. conclusion: This study is a proof of a significant benefit of the VMaT technique compared with 3DcrT in terms of side effects in nasopharynx patients, and adds dosimetric correlations.

References Powered by Scopus

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma

1112Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Initial report on a randomized controlled clinical trial

659Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Xerostomia and its predictors following parotid-sparing irradiation of head-and-neck cancer

656Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Survival outcomes for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma in non–endemic region in the UK treated with intensity modulated based radiotherapy 65 Gy in 30 fractions ± weekly cisplatin chemotherapy

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

VMAT plan quality comparison between Clinac-iX and halcyon treatment delivery systems for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Factors affecting MV imager projection offset in machine performance check for Varian linear accelerator

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franzese, C., Fogliata, A., Loi, M., Badalamenti, M., Franceschini, D., Comito, T., … Scorsetti, M. (2021). Dosimetric impact of volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal cancer treatment. Reports of Practical Oncology and Radiotherapy, 26(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2021.0017

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 3

75%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

50%

Physics and Astronomy 3

38%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0