Reliability of MR perfusion-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch measurement methods

13Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We investigated 2 methods of measuring MR imaging perfusion-diffusion mismatch to determine whether reliability is improved by direct measurement on a single, blended map. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Image software was used for measurement of lesion volumes from diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and mean transit time (MTT) calculated from perfusion-weighted (PWI) images on 64 patients with acute stroke. For the first method, the DWI and MTT lesions were measured separately. For the second method, the mismatch volume was measured directly on the blended images created from the registered DWI and MTT images. RESULTS: Test-retest agreement was 100% and 97% for the separate and blended methods using mismatch cutoffs of 20% or more versus less than 20%. There were no significant differences in the mismatch statistics between the methods. CONCLUSIONS: Mismatch volumes by a single reader can provide highly reliable and consistent results even when separately measuring DWI and MTT lesions. Propagation of measurement error was not demonstrated, and the methods were statistically comparable.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luby, M., & Warach, S. (2007). Reliability of MR perfusion-weighted and diffusion-weighted imaging mismatch measurement methods. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 28(9), 1674–1678. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A0643

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free