HTK versus multidose cardioplegias for myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Histidine–tryptophan–ketoglutarate (HTK) cardioplegia for myocardial protection obviates the need for maintenance cardioplegia doses, and thus allows for greater focus on procedure accuracy. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HTK versus multidose cardioplegias during cardiac surgery in an adult population. Methods: Electronic searches were performed using PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar databases. The key search terms included HTK cardioplegia AND cardiac surgery AND adult. This was followed by a meta-analysis investigating cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) duration, cross-clamp duration, spontaneous defibrillation, inotropic support, mortality, atrial fibrillation, creatine kinase muscle brain band (CK-MB) and troponin I (TnI). Results: Seven randomized controlled trials (n = 804) were analyzed. Spontaneous defibrillation following aortic cross-clamp removal significantly favored HTK (odds ratio [OR], 2.809; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.574 to 5.012; I2 = 0%; p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Reynolds, A. C., Asopa, S., Modi, A., & King, N. (2021). HTK versus multidose cardioplegias for myocardial protection in adult cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 36(4), 1334–1343. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocs.15397

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free