Aggression, politeness, and abstract adversaries

43Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Trudy Govier argues in The Philosophy of Argument that adversariality in argumentation can be kept to a necessary minimum. On her account, politeness can limit the ancillary adversariality of hostile culture but a degree of logical opposition will remain part of argumentation, and perhaps all reasoning. Argumentation cannot be purified by politeness in the way she hopes, nor does reasoning even in the discursive context of argumentation demand opposition. Such hopes assume an idealized politeness free from gender, and reasoners with inhuman or at least highly privileged capabilities and no need to learn from others or share understanding. © Catherine Hundleby.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hundleby, C. (2013). Aggression, politeness, and abstract adversaries. Informal Logic, 33(2 SPL.ISSUE), 238–262. https://doi.org/10.22329/il.v33i2.3895

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free