From 'direct versus indirect' toward an integrated restorative concept in the posterior dentition

45Citations
Citations of this article
276Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Traditionally, indirect restorations are expected to have better longevity than direct restorations. The introduction of adhesive dentistry and the minimally invasive approach of restorative treatment has changed this. In this article, the differences in longevity between direct and indirect restorations in the posterior dentition are explained. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of direct and indirect restorations placed in a minimally invasive way and using a proper adhesive technique are described.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Opdam, N. J. M., Frankenberger, R., & Magne, P. (2016). From “direct versus indirect” toward an integrated restorative concept in the posterior dentition. Operative Dentistry, 41, S27–S34. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-126-LIT

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free