From 'direct versus indirect' toward an integrated restorative concept in the posterior dentition

47Citations
Citations of this article
277Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Traditionally, indirect restorations are expected to have better longevity than direct restorations. The introduction of adhesive dentistry and the minimally invasive approach of restorative treatment has changed this. In this article, the differences in longevity between direct and indirect restorations in the posterior dentition are explained. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of direct and indirect restorations placed in a minimally invasive way and using a proper adhesive technique are described.

References Powered by Scopus

Longevity of posterior composite restorations: Not only a matter of materials

752Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Longevity of posterior composite restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis

584Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

12-year survival of composite vs. amalgam restorations

437Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Severe tooth wear: European consensus statement on management guidelines

236Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Current options concerning the endodontically-treated teeth restoration with the adhesive approach

107Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Clinical performance of occlusal onlays made of lithium disilicate ceramic in patients with severe tooth wear up to 11 years

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Opdam, N. J. M., Frankenberger, R., & Magne, P. (2016). From “direct versus indirect” toward an integrated restorative concept in the posterior dentition. Operative Dentistry, 41, S27–S34. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-126-LIT

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 91

74%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

12%

Researcher 9

7%

Lecturer / Post doc 8

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 152

96%

Materials Science 3

2%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

1%

Social Sciences 1

1%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free