Traditionally, indirect restorations are expected to have better longevity than direct restorations. The introduction of adhesive dentistry and the minimally invasive approach of restorative treatment has changed this. In this article, the differences in longevity between direct and indirect restorations in the posterior dentition are explained. In addition, the advantages and disadvantages of direct and indirect restorations placed in a minimally invasive way and using a proper adhesive technique are described.
CITATION STYLE
Opdam, N. J. M., Frankenberger, R., & Magne, P. (2016). From “direct versus indirect” toward an integrated restorative concept in the posterior dentition. Operative Dentistry, 41, S27–S34. https://doi.org/10.2341/15-126-LIT
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.