Placement, rate and source of N, seedrow opener and seeding depth effects on canola production

33Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Seedrow-placement of N fertilizer can save money and time, but it can cause reduced emergence and yield. From 1998 to 2000, a field experiment was conducted on a silty clay loam (Black Chernozem) soil at Melfort, Saskatchewan. The objectives were to determine the influence of placement, rate and source of N, seedrow opener and seeding depth on the emergence, yield, N uptake, and seed protein and oil content of canola (Brassica napus L. 'Quest'). The treatments were optimum (1.5 cm) and deep (4.5 cm) seeding depths in two main plots with 17 subplots of different combinations of N sources [urea and ammonium nitrate (AN)], rates (0, 40, 80 and 120 kg N ha-1) and placements (sideband and seedrow) using two seedrow openers (knives -2 cm spread, and shovels -20 cm spread). Sidebanding of 40, 80 and 120 kg N ha-1 and seedrow placement of 40 kg N ha-1 increased yield, N uptake and seed protein content, had no detrimental effect on emergence, and reduced seed oil content. Compared to sidebanding, seedrow placement of 80 and 120 kg N ha-1 generally reduced emergence, yield and N uptake, with relatively severe effect at higher N rate, but had no effect on seed protein and oil content. The yield and N uptake of canola responded up to 120 kg N ha-1 with sidebanding compared to 40 kg N ha-1 for yield and 80 kg N ha-1 for N uptake with seedrow placement. Deep seeding reduced emergence, yield and N uptake in many cases, had no effect on seed protein content and reduced oil content in some treatments. At low rates of N, emergence was generally better with knives, while shovels tended to be superior at higher rates of seedrow-placed N. In general, the negative impact of seedrow placement compared to sideband placement of N was more severe with deeper seeding, higher N rate and narrower width of seedrow placement band. In summary, the findings indicated that practices that placed seed and fertilizer in a way that maximized canola emergence and minimized seedling damage from fertilizer, consistently optimized seed yield response to N fertilizer.

References Powered by Scopus

Effects of nitrogen and sulfur on canola yield and nutrient uptake

202Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SULFUR NUTRITION OF RAPESEED: I. INFLUENCE OF FERTILIZER NITROGEN AND SULFUR RATES.

128Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The effect of fertilizers and harvest date on growth and yield of oilseed rape sown in autumn and spring

72Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Nitrogen use efficiency and nitrogen uptake of juncea canola under diverse environments

78Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Rotational effects of legumes and non-legumes on hybrid canola and malting barley

74Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Brassica juncea canola in the northern Great Plains: Responses to diverse environments and nitrogen fertilization

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malhi, S. S., & Gill, K. S. (2004). Placement, rate and source of N, seedrow opener and seeding depth effects on canola production. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 84(3), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.4141/P03-174

Readers over time

‘11‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘20‘21‘2202468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 6

50%

Researcher 5

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10

77%

Environmental Science 1

8%

Engineering 1

8%

Earth and Planetary Sciences 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0