Toward a theory of deaf ethnos: Deafnicity ≈ D/deaf: (Hómaemon • Homóglosson • Homóthreskon)

35Citations
Citations of this article
60Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Should ethnicity be used to interpret relations between the Deaf community and the hearing people? Recent scholarship questioning the merits of Deaf ethnicity suggests a need to reexamine the use of ethnicity when describing Deaf identity and culture. This article provides an overview of key contributions to race and ethnicity discourse in the 20th century, identifies epistemological and ontological errors to avoid, suggests adherence to the classical Greek concept of ethnos as an alternative to ethnie, and argues for the continuing significance of Deaf ethnicity. Specifically, I propose that Deaf ethnicity is a triadic relational nexus that approximates communities of origin, language, and religion. This is expressed as Deafnicity ≈ D/deaf (Hómaemon • Homóglosson • Homóthreskon). Deafnicity offers a promising alternative for examining relations between Deaf and hearing communities, exploring variance between nationalized Deaf communities, and expanding our understanding of audism. © The Author 2010. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eckert, R. C. (2010). Toward a theory of deaf ethnos: Deafnicity ≈ D/deaf: (Hómaemon • Homóglosson • Homóthreskon). Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 15(4), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enq022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free