Comparing Modeling Approaches for the Multi-Level Capacitated Lot-Sizing and Scheduling Problem

0Citations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Determining lot sizes is an essential step during the material requirements planning phase influencing total production cost and total throughput time of a production system. It is well-known that lot-sizing and scheduling decisions are intertwined. Neglecting this relation, as it is done in the classical hierarchical planning approach, leads to inefficient and sometimes infeasible plans. In this work we compare different approaches for integrating the lot-sizing and the scheduling decisions in multi-stage systems. We show their abilities and limitations in describing relevant aspects of a production environment. By applying the models to benchmark instances we analyze their computational behavior. The structural and numerical comparisons show that there are considerable differences between the approaches although all models aim to describe the same planning problem. The results provide a guideline for selecting the right modeling approach for different planning situations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Almeder, C. (2016). Comparing Modeling Approaches for the Multi-Level Capacitated Lot-Sizing and Scheduling Problem. In Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance (Vol. 22, pp. 333–348). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39120-5_19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free