The role of anti-Müllerian hormone in prediction of pregnancy in young and older women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level is considered to be a reliable marker of ovarian reserve. However, there are conflicting reports on the role of AMH level in predicting pregnancy after intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical value of AMH in predicting pregnancy in younger and older women with unexplained infertility undergoing gonadotropin stimulation and IUI. Methods: The medical records of 84 women who underwent first gonadotropin-stimulated IUI cycle owing to unexplained infertility were retrospectively evaluated. The relation of AMH levels with clinical pregnancy rate was analyzed. Results: The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 19%. There was no significant difference in AMH levels between the pregnant and nonpregnant women (2.0 ± 1.0 vs 2.8 ± 2.0 ng/mL, respectively, p = 0.250). A further analysis according to age also failed to reveal significant differences in AMH levels between pregnant and nonpregnant women for both the younger (<35 years, n = 61) and the older (≥35 years, n = 23) subgroups (p = 0.714 and 0.532, respectively). Post-hoc power analysis showed a power of 0.80 with a 5% level of significance and a 0.8 effect size. Conclusion: These findings indicate that AMH levels cannot predict pregnancy in women with unexplained infertility undergoing gonadotropin-stimulated IUI cycle. In addition, AMH is not a strong predictive factor for pregnancy either in younger or older women.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Seckin, B., Tokmak, A., & Yumusak, O. H. (2019). The role of anti-Müllerian hormone in prediction of pregnancy in young and older women with unexplained infertility undergoing intrauterine insemination. Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, 82(4), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCMA.0000000000000023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free