Efficacy of on-demand intrahepatic arterial therapy in combination with sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of “on-demand” combination therapy with sorafenib and hepatic arterial treatments, such as transarterial chemoembolization and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and methods: Eighty consecutive patients with advanced HCC, 58 administered sorafenib monotherapy and 22 administered on-demand combination therapy, were retrospectively evaluated. Results: The disease control rate was significantly higher in the combination group than in the monotherapy group (86.3% vs 51.7%, p=0.01). Elevated alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly more frequent in the combination group (40.9% vs 12.1%, p=0.01), but it was tolerable. Progression-free survival (180 vs 45 days, p=0.045) and overall survival (983 vs 452 days, p=0.004) were significantly longer in the combination group, as was the duration of sorafenib treatment (367 vs 66 days, p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that hepatitis C virus infection, disease control, and combination therapy were positive independent prognostic factors for survival, whereas alpha-fetoprotein >400 ng/mL was negatively prognostic. In patients receiving combination therapy, male sex, hepatitis B virus infection, performance status deterioration, Barcelona clinic liver cancer-B, and major vascular invasion were prognostic of survival. Conclusion: On-demand combination therapy was tolerated and may be a therapeutic option for patients with advanced HCC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tajiri, K., Futsukaichi, Y., Kobayashi, S., Nagata, K., Yasumura, S., Takahara, T., … Yasuda, I. (2019). Efficacy of on-demand intrahepatic arterial therapy in combination with sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. OncoTargets and Therapy, 12, 2205–2214. https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S191741

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free