Skill composition of immigration flows and the measurement of education-occupation mismatch

6Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Recent papers have found that often immigrants are overqualified relative to native-born workers when comparing an individual’s education to the ‘average’ education in their occupation. We show that these results are sensitive to differences in the education distribution between immigrants and the native born. Using data for New Zealand, which has an immigration policy that favours skilled immigrants, we find that this approach leads one to conclude that immigrants are, on average, overqualified for their occupation. However, once we account for the fact that immigrants are on average more skilled than natives, we find that immigrants are, in fact, less overeducated than natives. JEL classification: F22, J21, J61

References Powered by Scopus

Chapter 48 Race and gender in the labor market

1135Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

International data on educational attainment: Updates and implications

988Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants

823Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Which Integration Policies Work? The Heterogeneous Impact of National Institutions on Immigrants’ Labor Market Attainment in Europe

30Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Skilled migration and business cycle dynamics

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impacts of education and immigration on the size and skills of the future workforce

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poot, J., & Stillman, S. (2016). Skill composition of immigration flows and the measurement of education-occupation mismatch. IZA Journal of Migration, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40176-016-0066-y

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 15

71%

Professor / Associate Prof. 3

14%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

14%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10

50%

Social Sciences 6

30%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

15%

Philosophy 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free