Assessment of turbulence-chemistry interaction models in the computation of turbulent non-premixed flames

11Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The present work reports on the assessment of different turbulence-chemistry interaction closures for the modelling of turbulent non-premixed combustion. Two-dimensional axisymmetric simulations have been carried out based on three different laboratory flames. The methane fueled, piloted jet flame Sandia D, the simple jet syngas flame and the so-called Delft Jet-in-Hot Coflow flame are studied. All the flames can be characterised as non-premixed but differ by some features which are taken into account through appropriate modelling approach.

References Powered by Scopus

The numerical computation of turbulent flows

12216Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Turbulent combustion modeling

890Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of turbulence on species mass fractions in methane/air jet flames

663Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

On the effects of NH<inf>3</inf> addition to a reacting mixture of H<inf>2</inf>/CH<inf>4</inf> under MILD combustion regime: Numerical modeling with a modified EDC combustion model

49Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Generalised Eddy Dissipation Concept for MILD combustion regime at low local Reynolds and Damköhler numbers. Part 2: Validation of the model

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Speeding up turbulent reactive flow simulation via a deep artificial neural network: A methodology study

20Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lewandowski, M. T., & Pozorski, J. (2016). Assessment of turbulence-chemistry interaction models in the computation of turbulent non-premixed flames. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 760). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/760/1/012015

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 20

91%

Researcher 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Engineering 14

64%

Chemical Engineering 4

18%

Energy 3

14%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

5%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free