Vertical nystagmus: Clinical facts and hypotheses

234Citations
Citations of this article
149Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The pathophysiology of spontaneous upbeat (UBN) and downbeat (DBN) nystagmus is reviewed in the light of several instructive clinical findings and experimental data. UBN due to pontine lesions could result from damage to the ventral tegmental tract (VTT), originating in the superior vestibular nucleus (SVN), coursing through the ventral pons and transmitting excitatory upward vestibular signals to the third nerve nucleus. A VTT lesion probably leads to relative hypoactivity of the drive to the motoneurons of the elevator muscles with, consequently, an imbalance between the downward and upward systems, resulting in a downward slow phase. The results observed in internuclear ophthalmoplegia suggest that the medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) is involved in the transmission of both upward and downward vestibular signals. Since no clinical cases of DBN due to focal brainstem damage have been reported, it may be assumed that the transmission of downward vestibular signals depends only upon the MLF, whereas that of upward vestibular signals involves both the MLF and the VTT. The main focal lesions resulting in DBN affect the cerebellar flocculus and/or paraflocculus. Apparently, this structure tonically inhibits the SVN and its excitatory efferent tract (i.e. the VTT) but not the downward vestibular system. Therefore, a floccular lesion could result in a disinhibition of the SVN-VTT pathway with, consequently, relative hyperactivity of the drive to the motoneurons of the elevator muscles, resulting in an upward slow phase. UBN also results from lesions affecting the caudal medulla. An area in this region could form part of a feedback loop involved in upward gaze-holding, originating in a collateral branch of the VTT and comprising the caudal medulla, the flocculus and the SVN, successively. Therefore, it is suggested that the main types of spontaneous vertical nystagmus due to focal central lesions result from a primary dysfunction of the SVN-VTT pathway, which becomes hypoactive after pontine or caudal medullary lesions, thereby eliciting UBN, and hyperactive after floccular lesions, thereby eliciting DBN. Lastly, since gravity influences UBN and DBN and may facilitate the downward vestibular system and restrain the upward vestibular system, it is hypothesized that the excitatory SVN-VTT pathway, along with its specific floccular inhibition, has developed to counteract the gravity pull. This anatomical hyperdevelopment is apparently associated with a physiological upward velocity bias, since the gain of all upward slow eye movements is greater than that of downward slow eye movements in normal human subjects and in monkeys. © The Author (2005). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved.

References Powered by Scopus

Effects of ablation of flocculus and paraflocculus on eye movements in primate

713Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Afferents to the flocculus of the cerebellum in the rhesus macaque as revealed by retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase

264Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Downbeat nystagmus: A type of central vestibular nystagmus

222Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Functional brain imaging of peripheral and central vestibular disorders

246Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Downbeat nystagmus: Aetiology and comorbidity in 117 patients

159Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Pediatric neuro-ophthalmology

136Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pierrot-Deseilligny, C., & Milea, D. (2005). Vertical nystagmus: Clinical facts and hypotheses. Brain. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh532

Readers over time

‘09‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 46

47%

Researcher 28

29%

Professor / Associate Prof. 16

16%

Lecturer / Post doc 7

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 78

71%

Neuroscience 21

19%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7

6%

Psychology 4

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0