Comparative analysis of automatic exudate detection between machine learning and traditional approaches

2Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To prevent blindness from diabetic retinopathy, periodic screening and early diagnosis are neccessary. Due to lack of expert ophthalmologists in rural area, automated early exudate (one of visible sign of diabetic retinopathy) detection could help to reduce the number of blindness in diabetic patients. Traditional automatic exudate detection methods are based on specific parameter configuration, while the machine learning approaches which seems more flexible may be computationally high cost. A comparative analysis of traditional and machine learning of exudates detection, namely, mathematical morphology, fuzzy c-means clustering, naïve Bayesian classifier, Support Vector Machine and Nearest Neighbor classifier are presented. Detected exudates are validated with expert ophthalmologists' hand-drawn ground-truths. The sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy and time complexity of each method are also compared. Copyright © 2009 The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sopharak, A., Uyyanonvara, B., Barman, S., & Williamson, T. (2009). Comparative analysis of automatic exudate detection between machine learning and traditional approaches. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E92-D(11), 2264–2271. https://doi.org/10.1587/transinf.E92.D.2264

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free