Data models, representation and adequacy-for-purpose

41Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We critically engage two traditional views of scientific data and outline a novel philosophical view that we call the pragmatic-representational (PR) view of data. On the PR view, data are representations that are the product of a process of inquiry, and they should be evaluated in terms of their adequacy or fitness for particular purposes. Some important implications of the PR view for data assessment, related to misrepresentation, context-sensitivity, and complementary use, are highlighted. The PR view provides insight into the common but little-discussed practices of iteratively reusing and repurposing data, which result in many datasets’ having a phylogeny—an origin and complex evolutionary history—that is relevant to their evaluation and future use. We relate these insights to the open-data and data-rescue movements, and highlight several future avenues of research that build on the PR view of data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bokulich, A., & Parker, W. (2021). Data models, representation and adequacy-for-purpose. European Journal for Philosophy of Science, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13194-020-00345-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free