A cost analysis of intensified vs conventional multifactorial therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the Steno-2 study

17Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aims/hypothesis: Long-term follow-up of the Steno-2 study demonstrated that intensified multifactorial intervention increased median lifespan by 7.9 years and delayed incident cardiovascular disease by a median of 8.1 years compared with conventional multifactorial intervention during 21.2 years of follow-up. In this post hoc analysis of data from the Steno-2 study, we aimed to study the difference in direct medical costs associated with conventional vs intensified treatment. Methods: In 1993, 160 Danish individuals with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria were randomised to conventional or intensified multifactorial target-driven intervention for 7.8 years. Information on direct healthcare costs was retrieved from health registries, and the costs in the two groups of participants were compared by bootstrap t test analysis. Results: Over 21.2 years of follow-up, there was no difference in total direct medical costs between the intensified treatment group, €12,126,900, and the conventional treatment group, €11,181,700 (p = 0.48). The mean cost per person-year during 1996–2014 was significantly lower in the intensified treatment group (€8725 in the intensive group and €10,091 in the conventional group, p = 0.045). The main driver of this difference was reduced costs associated with inpatient admissions related to cardiovascular disease (p = 0.0024). Conclusions/interpretation: Over a follow-up period of 21.2 years, we found no difference in total costs and reduced cost per person-year associated with intensified multifactorial treatment for 7.8 years compared with conventional multifactorial treatment. Considering the substantial gain in life-years and health benefits achieved with intensified treatment, we conclude that intensified multifaceted intervention in high-risk individuals with type 2 diabetes seems to be highly feasible when balancing healthcare costs and treatment benefits in a Danish healthcare setting.

References Powered by Scopus

Empagliflozin, cardiovascular outcomes, and mortality in type 2 diabetes

9359Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Liraglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes

5476Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes

4384Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Blood pressure control for diabetic retinopathy

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Management of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes with Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Dulaglutide, Exenatide ER, Liraglutide and Lixisenatide: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis in the Danish Setting

29Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

SGLT2 Inhibitors: Slowing of Chronic Kidney Disease Progression in Type 2 Diabetes

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gæde, J., Oellgaard, J., Ibsen, R., Gæde, P., Nørtoft, E., Parving, H. H., … Pedersen, O. (2019). A cost analysis of intensified vs conventional multifactorial therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a post hoc analysis of the Steno-2 study. Diabetologia, 62(1), 147–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-018-4739-3

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

56%

Researcher 9

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 21

75%

Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceut... 3

11%

Nursing and Health Professions 2

7%

Psychology 2

7%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 65

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free