Physicians’ perception of task sharing with non-physician health care workers in the management of uncomplicated hypertension in Nigeria: A mixed method study

1Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

>. Twenty physicians were subsequently interviewed for in-depth exploration of their perception of TSTS. Results A total of 1250 physicians participated in the quantitative aspect of the study. Among the participants, 56.6% had good perception of TSTS in the management of hypertension while about two-thirds (67.5%) agreed that TSTS program in the management of hypertension could be successfully implemented in Nigeria. Male gender (p = 0.019) and working in clinical settings (p = 0.039) were associated with good perception. Twenty physicians participated in the qualitative part of the study. Qualitative analysis showed that TSTS will improve overall care and outcomes of patients with hypertension, reduce physicians’ workload, improve their productivity, but may encourage inter-professional rivalry. Wide consultation with stakeholders, adequate monitoring and evaluation will facilitate successful implementation of TSTS in Nigeria. Conclusion This study showed that more than half of the physicians have good perception of TSTS in hypertension management while about two-thirds agreed that it could be successfully implemented in Nigeria. This study provides the needed evidence for increased advocacy for the implementation of TSTS in the management of hypertension in Nigeria. This will consequently result in improved patient care and outcomes and effective utilization of available health care personnel.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adejumo, O. A., Ogundele, O. A., Mamven, M., Otubogun, F. M., Junaid, O. A., Okoye, O. C., … Odili, A. N. (2023). Physicians’ perception of task sharing with non-physician health care workers in the management of uncomplicated hypertension in Nigeria: A mixed method study. PLoS ONE, 18(9 September). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291541

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free