Parallel, divergent or drifting? Regulating healthcare products in a post-Brexit UK

9Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

EU laws have exerted a powerful influence on research, manufacturing, supply, sale and procurement of the products on which national health systems rely. Pre-Brexit, the UK was closely involved in the policy and operation of regulations affecting these goods. Since Brexit, ideological polarisation and the political salience of health during a global pandemic have driven a rhetoric of competitive divergence. However, active UK policy divergence to date is limited. It is unsettled whether the UK, as a small market in this global industry, genuinely seeks a higher risk, more industry-friendly regulatory paradigm. With regulatory and policy capacity also under strain, important decisions have been delayed. The position of Northern Ireland remains highly precarious, with negotiations ongoing on how to handle its unique partial status within the single market. The UK’s attempt to remain within the EU’s research funding programme has consequently been pushed into involuntary divergence.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dayan, M., Hervey, T., Fahy, N., Vlachakis, E., McCarey, M., Flear, M., … Jarman, H. (2023). Parallel, divergent or drifting? Regulating healthcare products in a post-Brexit UK. Journal of European Public Policy, 30(11), 2540–2572. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2213721

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free