Iron absorption by healthy women is not associated with either serum or urinary prohepcidin

47Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Although hepcidin is proposed as a regulator of iron absorption, this has not been assessed in humans. Objective: Our objective was to assess the relation between serum or urinary prohepcidin and iron absorption in healthy premenopausal women. Design: The subjects were 28 healthy women aged 22-51 y with normal hemoglobin concentrations (120-152 g/L). Absorption of 0.5 mg Fe with 0.2 μCi 59Fe tracer, both as FeSO4, was measured by whole-body scintillation counting 13 d after oral administration. Fasting blood and urine samples were collected the day of and 16 wk after the absorption measurement. Serum and urinary prohepcidin concentrations were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay by using an antibody against amino acid residues 28-47 of the proregion. Results: Mean (±SD) iron absorption was 36 ± 19% (range: 4-81%), and serum ferritin (geometric x-) was 27 μg/L (range: 4-122 μg/L), as commonly observed in healthy premenopausal women. Serum prohepcidin was 196 μg/L (range: 99-376 μg/L) and, in contrast with urinary prohepcidin, was relatively consistent for the women between 0 and 16 wk. Serum prohepcidin correlated directly with serum ferritin (R2 = 0.28, P < 0.01) but was unrelated to 59Fe absorption, in contrast to serum ferritin (R2 = 0.33, P < 0.01). Conclusions: Serum prohepcidin concentrations were relatively stable within subjects and correlated with serum ferritin. However, unlike serum ferritin, neither serum nor urinary prohepcidin concentrations were related to iron absorption in healthy women. © 2006 American Society for Nutrition.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hadley, K. B., Johnson, L. K., & Hunt, J. R. (2006). Iron absorption by healthy women is not associated with either serum or urinary prohepcidin. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 84(1), 150–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcn/84.1.150

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free