Total reward preferences in the recruitment and retention of county chief administrative officers: Applying a push/pull theory of motivation

1Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Monetary rewards have historically played a prominent role in public employee turnover. Additionally, non-monetary rewards such as internal environmental factors contribute to the ability to recruit, retain, and satisfy public employees. Our research seeks to apply the push and pull theory of motivation to the total reward (intrinsic and extrinsic rewards) preferences of county chief administrative officers (CAOs) in the state of Georgia. CAOs typically have job titles such as County Administrator or County Manager. In understanding which rewards are most valued by CAOs, local governments can better understand the ways their CAOs value different rewards. In other words, which rewards are most likely to “pull” a CAO to another position; and conversely, does the lack of certain rewards “push” CAOs towards other jurisdictions or even other careers? In addition, this research aims to examine whether demographic variables of CAOs impacts total reward preferences.

References Powered by Scopus

Turnover: The real bottom line

223Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Turnover among city managers: The role of political and economic change

86Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

POLITICAL CONFLICT OR PROFESSIONAL ADVANCEMENT: Alternative Explanations of City Manager Turnover

36Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Advancing open access to PAR

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lasseter, D., & Daman, A. (2024). Total reward preferences in the recruitment and retention of county chief administrative officers: Applying a push/pull theory of motivation. Public Administration Review, 84(1), 173–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13635

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘25036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Business, Management and Accounting 2

40%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

20%

Psychology 1

20%

Computer Science 1

20%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0