Only a few studies have addressed the role of alternative paths in German secondary education. These paths were introduced to reduce social inequalities. However, there is much controversy regarding whether alternative paths actually do reduce inequalities. Schindler most recently discussed in the Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie that this controversy is due in part to different understandings of how empirical studies assess the effect of social origin. This article adopts and critically extends this point by arguing that, from a social inequality point of view, alternative paths can only be understood adequately if research reconstructs the effect of social origin systematically and as holistically as possible. Additionally, we raise the question whether the measure that is traditionally used by educational research to assess social inequalities (Odds Ratios) is really the most adequate one to understand how alternative paths impact on inequalities in educational attainment. Instead we suggest the estimation of Average Marginal Effects.
CITATION STYLE
Buchholz, S., & Pratter, M. (2017). Wer profitiert von alternativen Bildungswegen? Alles eine Frage des Blickwinkels!: Eine systematische Rekonstruktion des Effektes sozialer Herkunft für alternative Wege zur Hochschulreife. Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 69(3), 409–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0484-8
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.