Wer profitiert von alternativen Bildungswegen? Alles eine Frage des Blickwinkels!: Eine systematische Rekonstruktion des Effektes sozialer Herkunft für alternative Wege zur Hochschulreife

17Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Only a few studies have addressed the role of alternative paths in German secondary education. These paths were introduced to reduce social inequalities. However, there is much controversy regarding whether alternative paths actually do reduce inequalities. Schindler most recently discussed in the Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie that this controversy is due in part to different understandings of how empirical studies assess the effect of social origin. This article adopts and critically extends this point by arguing that, from a social inequality point of view, alternative paths can only be understood adequately if research reconstructs the effect of social origin systematically and as holistically as possible. Additionally, we raise the question whether the measure that is traditionally used by educational research to assess social inequalities (Odds Ratios) is really the most adequate one to understand how alternative paths impact on inequalities in educational attainment. Instead we suggest the estimation of Average Marginal Effects.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buchholz, S., & Pratter, M. (2017). Wer profitiert von alternativen Bildungswegen? Alles eine Frage des Blickwinkels!: Eine systematische Rekonstruktion des Effektes sozialer Herkunft für alternative Wege zur Hochschulreife. Kolner Zeitschrift Fur Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 69(3), 409–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0484-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free