The diagnostic accuracy of pleomorphic adenoma in fine needle aspiration: Features leading to false positive and false negative diagnoses and the utility of cell blocks

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a well-established tool in preoperative diagnosis of salivary gland lesions with diagnostic accuracy of 90%. Pleomorphic adenoma (PA) is the most common salivary gland tumor comprising 45%–74% of all salivary gland tumors with FNA diagnostic accuracy of 89.5%–96.2%. The aim of the present study was to determine and analyze potential cytomorphological pitfalls and evaluate the diagnostic accuracy in FNA diagnosis of PA. Methods: Salivary gland specimens with both cytological and histological diagnoses were searched over a 10-year-period (2009–2018) from a laboratory information system of Pathology Department, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere and matched to determine concordant and discordant PA cases. Sufficient material in histological and cytological sample was found in 401 cases. In 218 cases (54.4%) diagnosis was true-negative PA, in 169 cases (42.1%) diagnosis was true-positive PA and there were 14 discordant cases: 4 false-positive cases and 10 false-negative cases. False-negative cases were reclassified and subgrouped according to The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC). Results: Cytomorphologically, cell type predominance was more often myoepithelial in true-positive cases (65%) and epithelial both in false-negative (70%, p =.007) and false-positive cases (75%, p =.027). Well-formed ducts were present in cytology in all true-positive cases (p

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tommola, E., Tommola, S., & Kholová, I. (2023). The diagnostic accuracy of pleomorphic adenoma in fine needle aspiration: Features leading to false positive and false negative diagnoses and the utility of cell blocks. Diagnostic Cytopathology, 51(5), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.25109

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free