Comparison of the Accuracy of the Risk-Based Capital and Early Warning System Method in Assessing the Financial Performance of Sharia Life Insurance

  • Abdurahim A
  • Setiawan R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) and Early Warning System (EWS) methods in measuring the financial performance of sharia insurance. The study's subjects were Islamic life insurance companies registered with the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in 2018. Measurement of financial performance with Risk-Based Capital (RBC) used solvency ratios, and Early Warning System (EWS) employed solvency ratios, liquidity ratios, rentability ratios, and technical ratio. The analysis technique utilized a paired sample test. The results showed that the EWS method had a greater deviation than RBC. It means that the RBC method is more accurate than the EWS method.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abdurahim, A., & Setiawan, R. (2021). Comparison of the Accuracy of the Risk-Based Capital and Early Warning System Method in Assessing the Financial Performance of Sharia Life Insurance. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020-Accounting and Management (ICoSIAMS 2020) (Vol. 176). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/aer.k.210121.026

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free