Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: A systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect

33Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aims of this systematic literature review were to assess whether the detection of pubovisceral avulsions using magnetic resonance (MR) imaging or perineal ultrasonography was clinically relevant in women with pelvic floor dysfunction and to evaluate the relation with anatomy, symptoms, and recurrence after surgery. We performed a systematic literature review using three bibliographical databases (PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL) as data sources. Clinical studies were included in which pubovisceral avulsions were studied in relation to pelvic organ prolapse (POP) stage, pelvic floor symptoms, and/or recurrence of POP after surgery. Ultimately, 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. POP stage and recurrence of POP after surgery were strongly associated with pubovisceral avulsions. Contradictory results were found regarding the relation between pubovisceral avulsions and urinary symptoms and symptoms of anorectal dysfunction. Pubovisceral avulsions, as diagnosed by MR imaging or perineal ultrasonography, are associated with higher stages of POP and recurrence of POP after surgery. © 2012 The Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lammers, K., Fütterer, J. J., Prokop, M., Vierhout, M. E., & Kluivers, K. B. (2012, December). Diagnosing pubovisceral avulsions: A systematic review of the clinical relevance of a prevalent anatomical defect. International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1805-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free