Pigs, Prawns and Power Houses: Politics in Water Resources Management

  • Jensen K
  • Lange R
  • Refsgaard J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Normative ideals like Integrated Water Resource Management depicting the ‘good environmental governance’ have proliferated the last twenty years. However, evidence of effective implementation is scarce. The paper analyzes cases from India, the Mekong and Denmark where actors have sought to translate IWRM ideals into practice. The purpose is to demonstrate the importance of politics and power for water governance processes and their outcomes.The concept of social learning is applied in order to understand the dynamic interplay between actors, institutions and power in the political processes involved. It is argued that the political economy of water tends to vest the stronger stakeholders with an interest in upholding the status quo. Consequently, social learning typically centers on the ‘low lying fruits’ that does not challenge the prevailing distribution of re- sources. Strategic approaches looking outside the ‘water box’ are necessary to foster deeper changes in water resources management in both developing and developed countries

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jensen, K. M., Lange, R. B., & Refsgaard, J. C. (2018). Pigs, Prawns and Power Houses: Politics in Water Resources Management. In Water, Energy, Food and People Across the Global South (pp. 79–116). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64024-2_4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free