Musculoskeletal pain stakeholder engagement and partnership development: Determining patient-centered research priorities

11Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a global public health problem with increased societal burden. Increased attention has focused toward patient and other stakeholder perspectives when determining future MSK pain research priorities, however infrastructure and capacity building within the community are needed for individuals and organizations to participate in patient-centered outcomes research. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe our collaborative experiences with several MSK pain stakeholders and processes to identify a top priority research topic. Methods: Lunch meetings and formalized workshops were used to develop infrastructure for engaging patients and other stakeholders with early capacity building for partners to identify MSK pain research ideas based on their personal experiences. Additional capacity building and engagement through literature searching further prepared partners to contribute informed decisions about MSK pain research topics and subsequent selection of an important research question. Results: Several key deliverables (e.g., Governance Document, Communication Plan) were developed and completed over the course of this project to provide partnership structure. Other key deliverables included a list of preliminary comparative effectiveness research ideas (n = 8) and selection of shared decision making for MSK pain as the top priority research topic with patient partners identifying pain self-efficacy as an important outcome domain. Conclusions: Our patient partners provided the catalyst for identifying shared decision making as a high priority research topic based on a wide spectrum of stakeholder perspectives and unique experiences. Patient partners were primarily identified using a single rehabilitation health system and clinician partners were heavily weighted by physical therapists which may have introduced selection bias.

References Powered by Scopus

Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015

5827Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain-United States, 2016

3093Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice

2805Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Involving stakeholders in research priority setting: a scoping review

46Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

"Listen to me, learn from me": a priority setting partnership for shaping interdisciplinary pain training to strengthen chronic pain care

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Systematic review of community engagement approach in research: describing partnership approaches, challenges and benefits

9Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beneciuk, J. M., Verstandig, D., Taylor, C., Scott, D., Levin, J., Osborne, R., … McGarrie, L. (2020). Musculoskeletal pain stakeholder engagement and partnership development: Determining patient-centered research priorities. Research Involvement and Engagement, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-020-00192-8

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘250481216

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 17

77%

Researcher 4

18%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

35%

Social Sciences 5

29%

Nursing and Health Professions 4

24%

Computer Science 2

12%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0