Background: Despite the considerable impact ofmigraine, the use of preventive medication in primary care is limited. Only about 5% of migraine patients who qualify for prophylaxis actually receive it, and adherence is far from optimal. Aim: To explore the opinions of GPs regarding preventive medication for migraine. Design and setting: A qualitative focus group study in Dutch general practice. Method : Four focus groups (six GPs each) were formed. GPs were purposively sampled to acquire a range of participants, reflecting themore general GP population. Results: GPs perceived patients' concerns about the impact of migraine and the potential benefits of prophylaxis. However, some were hesitant to start prescribing prophylaxis due to doubts about effectiveness, potential side effects, and the risk of developing drug dependency. GPs' decisions were often based on considerations other than those presented in national guidelines, for example, the patient's need to control their own problem. Many GPs placed responsibility for initiating prophylaxis with the patient. Conclusion: Various considerations hamper GPs from managing migraine with preventive medication, and various patient-related concerns cause GPs to deviate from national headache guidelines. ©British Journal of General Practice.
CITATION STYLE
Dekker, F., Neven, A. K., Andriesse, B., Kernick, D., Ferrari, M. D., & Assendelft, W. J. J. (2012). Prophylactic treatment of migraine by GPs: A qualitative study. British Journal of General Practice, 62(597). https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp12X636100
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.