Research into Internet addiction (IA) has grown rapidly over the last decade. The topic has generated a great deal of debate, particularly in relation to how IA can be defned conceptually as well as the many methodological limitations. The present review aims to further elaborate and clarify issues that are relevant to IA research in a number of areas including: defnition and characterization, incidence and prevalence rates, associated neuronal processes, and implications for treatment, prevention, and patient-specifc considerations. It is concluded that there is no consensual defnition for IA. Prevalence rates among nationally representative samples across several countries vary greatly (from 1% to 18.7%), most likely refecting the lack of methodological consistency and conceptual rigor of the studies. The overlaps between IA and other more traditional substance-based addictions and the possible neural substrates implicated in IA are also highlighted. In terms of treatment and prevention, both psychological and pharmacological treatments are examined in light of existing evidence alongside particular aspects inherent to the patient perspective. Based on the evidence analyzed, it is concluded that IA may pose a serious health hazard to a minority of people.
CITATION STYLE
Pontes, H. M., Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015). Clinical psychology of internet addiction: A review of its conceptualization, prevalence, neuronal processes, and implications for treatment. Neuroscience and Neuroeconomics, 4, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.2147/NAN.S60982
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.