Proximity approaches and design strategies for non-cooperative rendezvous* V-bar hopping vs. spiral approach

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As the amount of debris in orbit increases, so does the risk of collisions and their seriousness. All nations involved with space operations acknowledge this growing threat. One solution receiving increased attention is active debris removal. The first step in a debris removal mission would be to approach the debris. In this phase, it is important to ensure passive abort safety and to guarantee the robustness against collisions in the case of off-nominal thruster burns, that may be caused by spacecraft anomalies such as navigation sensor or actuator failures. This paper compares two types of passive abort safe trajectories –the V-bar hopping and spiral approaches– considering the ¦V budget, the duration of operations, and variation in the line-of-sight vector to the target. This paper also proposes design strategies for determining the parameters in the two candidate trajectories, considering passive abort safety. The robustness of the trajectories against collisions due to off-nominal thruster burns is also demonstrated through Monte Carlo simulations. The paper investigates which trajectories are suitable for an active debris removal mission to a non-cooperative target.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sasaki, T., Nakajima, Y., & Yamamoto, T. (2021). Proximity approaches and design strategies for non-cooperative rendezvous* V-bar hopping vs. spiral approach. Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, 64(3), 136–146. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.64.136

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free