The political-strategic approach is one of the most employed frameworks within the methodologically heterogeneous subfield of populism studies. In the last two decades, it has contributed to the analysis of populism both in Latin America and the United States and, more recently, in Western and Eastern Europe. That being said, a close inspection of its axioms and its conceptualization of the phenomenon shows that it is built on ill-conceived premises. This article intends to be a comprehensive critique of the approach that can contribute to the methodological progress of the field. It criticizes the three main dysfunctions of the approach: selective rationalism, leader-centrism, and normative bias.
CITATION STYLE
Rueda, D. (2021). Is Populism a Political Strategy? A Critique of an Enduring Approach. Political Studies, 69(2), 167–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321720962355
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.