The Ethiopian-Eritea border conflict and the role of the international community

  • Zondi S
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Five years after signing a peace agreement which established the United Nations Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea (UNMEE) and set in motion the implementation of the Algiers Comprehensive Peace Accord (ACPA), the peace process between Eritrea and Ethiopia is deadlocked. Ethiopia has refused to abide by the ruling of the Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC) as agreed at Algiers, and Eritrea laments the disregard of agreements, especially by the international community that witnessed them. The Boundary Commission, charged with adjudicating a ruling on the border on the basis of colonial treaties, has left the local scene in despair. The war of words is fast turning into words about war. A war is looming in the region which is in the process of ending conflict in Sudan and Somalia. Just what constitutes the stand-off, what interventions have been made and what are prospects for peace or war are some of the questions that this article explores.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zondi, S. (2007). The Ethiopian-Eritea border conflict and the role of the international community. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/ajcr.v6i2.39404

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free