Nitrogen uptake and utilization by no-tillage rice under different soil moisture conditions - A model study under simulated soil conditions

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Most of the existing studies regarding water-saving cultivation on rice are based on tillage rice, rather than no-tillage rice. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effects of nitrogen fertilizer on no-tillage rice cultivation under various soil moisture conditions, in order to determine the suitable soil moisture content for rice production by no-tillage cultivation. Pot experiments were conducted in the early seasons of 2010 and 2011. In each season, a hybrid rice cultivar, Jiyou716, was planted under the soil moisture contents of 95-100% (W100), 80-85% (W85) and 65-70% (W70).15N was used as the nitrogen fertilizer. Yield, dry matter accumulation, nitrogen concentration and15N abundance of maturity were determined for each sample. The nitrogen loss of basal N-fertilizer (BF) and tillering N-fertilizer (TF) in W70 was 22-24% and 18-45% larger than in W100, respectively, resulting in reduction in nitrogen uptake and total nitrogen accumulation in plants. The yield of rice by no-tillage in W70 was 47-42% lower in 2011 and 2010. There was no significant difference between W85 and W100 in yield, nitrogen uptake and utilization in no-tillage cultivation. It was concluded that the N uptake and yield were decreased by decreasing soil moisture contents to 70% of saturation in no-tillage cultivation. Soil content of around 85% was proposed as a suitable condition without a large reduction in the yield and N use in water-saving cultivation, although a field test is essential for practical use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, C., Xu, S., Liu, L., Huang, M., Zheng, T., Wei, S., … Jiang, L. (2015). Nitrogen uptake and utilization by no-tillage rice under different soil moisture conditions - A model study under simulated soil conditions. Plant Production Science, 18(2), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1626/pps.18.118

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free