Perianal complete remission with combined therapy (Seton placement and anti-TNF agents) in crohn’s disease: A Brazilian multicenter observational study

22Citations
Citations of this article
63Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background-Perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease is one of the most severe phenotypes of inflammatory bowel diseases. Combined therapy with seton placement and anti-TNF therapy is the most common strategy for this condition. Objectives-The aim of this study was to analyze the rates of complete perianal remission after combined therapy for perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease. Methods-This was a retrospective observational study with perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease patients submitted to combined therapy from four inflammatory bowel diseases referral centers. We analyzed patients’ demographic characteristics, Montreal classification, concomitant medication, classification of the fistulae, occurrence of perianal complete remission and recurrence after remission. Complete perianal remission was defined as absence of drainage from the fistulae associated with seton removal. Discussion - A total of 78 patients were included, 44 (55.8%) females with a mean age of 33.8 (±15) years. Most patients were treated with Infliximab, 66.2%, than with Adalimumab, 33.8%. Complex fistulae were found in 52/78 patients (66.7%). After a medium follow-up of 48.2 months, 41/78 patients (52.6%) had complete perianal remission (95% CI: 43.5%–63.6%). Recurrence occurred in four (9.8%) patients (95% CI: 0.7%–18.8%) in an average period of 74.8 months. Conclusion - Combined therapy lead to favorable and durable results in perianal fistulizing Crohn’s disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kotze, P. G., de Albuquerque, I. C., Da Luz Moreira, A., Tonini, W. B., Olandoski, M., & Coy, C. S. R. (2014). Perianal complete remission with combined therapy (Seton placement and anti-TNF agents) in crohn’s disease: A Brazilian multicenter observational study. Arquivos de Gastroenterologia, 51(4), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0004-28032014000400004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free