Personalized machine learning for robot perception of affect and engagement in autism therapy

225Citations
Citations of this article
454Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Robots have the potential to facilitate future therapies for children on the autism spectrum. However, existing robots are limited in their ability to automatically perceive and respond to human affect, which is necessary for establishing and maintaining engaging interactions. Their inference challenge is made even harder by the fact that many individuals with autism have atypical and unusually diverse styles of expressing their affective-cognitive states. To tackle the heterogeneity in childrenwith autism, weused the latest advances in deep learning to formulate a personalized machine learning (ML) framework for automatic perception of the children's affective states and engagement during robot-assisted autism therapy. Instead of using the traditional one-size-fits-all ML approach, we personalized our framework to each child using their contextual information (demographics and behavioral assessment scores) and individual characteristics. We evaluated this framework on a multimodal (audio, video, and autonomic physiology) data set of 35 children (ages 3 to 13) with autism, from two cultures (Asia and Europe), and achieved an average agreement (intraclass correlation) of ~60% with human experts in the estimation of affect and engagement, also outperforming nonpersonalized ML solutions. These results demonstrate the feasibility of robot perception of affect and engagement in children with autism and have implications for the design of future autism therapies.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rudovic, O., Lee, J., Dai, M., Schuller, B., & Picard, R. W. (2018). Personalized machine learning for robot perception of affect and engagement in autism therapy. Science Robotics, 3(19). https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aao6760

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 163

64%

Researcher 47

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 30

12%

Lecturer / Post doc 16

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 114

51%

Engineering 66

29%

Psychology 35

16%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

4%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free