Taxing Sin

0Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Conventional wisdom dictates that those goods which are said to cause harm or impose costs on society deserve a special tax. For centuries, governments have levied these “sin taxes” on alcohol and tobacco, but the list of taxable sins has now grown to include soda and marijuana, with calls to impose further taxes on plastic bags, meat, and even robots and carbon. Contrary to what experts and policymakers tell us, many of these alleged sins impose very little, if any, cost on society, and the harms that do exist can be minimized without resorting to tax. What follows in this book is a discussion of four case studies-on tobacco, marijuana, alcohol and soda-which make the case against the conventional wisdom in taxing these “sins”, before concluding that when it comes to taxing sin, it is time for governments to forgive-and forget.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thom, M. (2020). Taxing Sin. Taxing Sin (pp. 1–185). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49176-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free