Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: An analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group JBR.10 trial

36Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group JBR.10 demonstrated that adjuvant vinorelbine and cisplatin after resection of stage IB-II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) improved relapse-free and overall survival. However, many patients either are not referred for chemotherapy or decline treatment. To aid in treatment decision making, quality-adjusted survival estimates of the JBR.10 trial were derived using a quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis. Methods: Survival curves for treatment (N = 242) and observation groups (N = 240) were partitioned into three health states: time with ≥ grade 2 (early or late) chemotherapy-related toxicity (TOX), time in relapse (REL), and time without toxicity or relapse (TWiST). Q-TWiST = uTOX x TOX + uTWiST x TWIST + u REL x REL, where weights uTOX, uTWIST, and uREL range from 0 to 1. Threshold utility analysis was performed to test the sensitivity of the results to changes in the weights. Weights were derived in an exploratory fashion using different methods. Methods included use of arbitrary values, European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) quality-of-life data prospectively collected in JBR.10 (global assessment questions and symptom-based questions), and lastly weights European Quality of Life-Five Dimensions questionnaire collected from early-stage NSCLC (nontrial) patients after resection with discounting for toxicity and relapse. The α level was .05. Results: Threshold utility analysis revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy was preferred for all possible weight values for relapse and toxicity (u REL, uTOX), although the result was not always statistically significant. The adjuvant chemotherapy group had better Q-TWiST in the range of 5 to 6 additional months, which was statistically significant using all methods. Conclusion: Adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage NSCLC improves quality-adjusted survival despite chemotherapy toxicity. © 2009 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

References Powered by Scopus

EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life

0
13009Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology

12792Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cancer Statistics, 2004

3973Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Treatment of stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American college of chest physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

1155Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Health-related quality of life and cancer clinical trials

170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MicroRNA as tools and therapeutics in lung cancer

101Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jang, R. W., Le Maître, A., Ding, K., Winton, T., Bezjak, A., Seymour, L., … Leighl, N. B. (2009). Quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in non-small-cell lung cancer: An analysis of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group JBR.10 trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 27(26), 4268–4273. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.5815

Readers over time

‘10‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 21

54%

Researcher 12

31%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

10%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 26

74%

Nursing and Health Professions 5

14%

Psychology 2

6%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

6%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0