Surgical outcomes of type a aortic dissection at a small-volume medical center: Analysis according to the extent of surgery

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Despite progress in treatment, Stanford type A aortic dissection is still a life-threatening disease. In this study, we analyzed surgical outcomes in patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection according to the extent of surgery at Daegu Catholic University Medical Center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 98 patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection who underwent surgery at our institution between January 2008 and June 2018. Of these patients, 82 underwent limited replacement (hemi-arch or ascending aortic replacement), while 16 patients underwent total arch replacement (TAR). We analyzed in-hospital mortality, postoperative complications, the overall 5-year survival rate, and the 5-year aortic event-free survival rate. Results: The median follow-up time was 48 months (range, 1-128 months), with a completion rate of 85.7% (n=84). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 8.2%: 6.1% in the limited replacement group and 18.8% in the TAR group (p=0.120). The overall 5-year survival rate was 78.8% in the limited replacement group and 81.3% in the TAR group (p=0.78). The overall 5-year aortic event-free survival rate was 85.3% in the limited replacement group and 88.9% in the TAR group (p=0.46). Conclusion: The extent of surgery was not related to the rates of in-hospital mortality, complications, aortic events, or survival. Although this study was conducted at a small-volume center, the in-hospital mortality and 5-year survival rates were satisfactory.

References Powered by Scopus

Surgical considerations of dissecting aneurysm of the aorta.

280Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Total arch repair versus hemiarch repair in the management of acute DeBakey type I aortic dissection

160Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Does the extent of proximal or distal resection influence outcome for type A dissections?

140Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Outcomes of hemi- vs. total arch replacement in acute type A aortic dissection: A systematic review and meta-analysis

13Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Proximal versus extensive repair in acute type A aortic dissection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Can preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predict in-hospital mortality in postoperative patients with Stanford type A aortic dissection? Evidence-based appraisal by meta-analysis and GRADE

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, C. H., Cho, J. W., Jang, J. S., & Yoon, T. H. (2020). Surgical outcomes of type a aortic dissection at a small-volume medical center: Analysis according to the extent of surgery. Korean Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 53(2), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2020.53.2.58

Readers over time

‘20‘21‘22‘23‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

67%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

17%

Researcher 1

17%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 7

88%

Engineering 1

13%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0