Testing hypotheses in ecoimmunology using mixed models: Disentangling hierarchical correlations

22Citations
Citations of this article
58Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Synopsis Considerable research in ecoimmunology focuses on investigating variation in immune responses and linking this variation to physiological trade-offs, ecological traits, and environmental conditions. Variation in immune responses exists within and among individuals, among populations, and among taxonomic groupings. Understanding how variation and covariation are distributed and how they differ across these levels is necessary for drawing appropriate ecological and evolutionary inferences. Moreover, variation at the among-individual level directly connects to underlying quantitative genetic parameters. In order to fully understand immune responses in evolutionary and ecological contexts and to reveal phylogenetic constraints on evolution, statistical approaches must allow (co)variance to be partitioned among levels of individual, population, and phylogenetic organization (e.g., population, species, genera, and various higher taxa). Herein, we describe how multi-response mixed-effects models can be used to partition variation in immune responses among different hierarchical levels, specifically within-individuals, among-individuals, and among-species. We use simulated data to demonstrate that mixed models allow for proper partitioning of (co)variances. Importantly, these simulations also demonstrate that conventional statistical tools grossly misestimate relevant parameters, which urges caution in relating ecoimmunological hypotheses to existing empirical research. We conclude by discussing the advantages and caveats of a mixed-effects modeling approach. © The Author 2014.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Downs, C. J., & Dochtermann, N. A. (2014). Testing hypotheses in ecoimmunology using mixed models: Disentangling hierarchical correlations. In Integrative and Comparative Biology (Vol. 54, pp. 407–418). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icu035

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free