Appropriate Pragmatic Behaviour: Response to Foster-Cohen and Wong

0Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In my comment on Foster-Cohen and Wong (Early intervention at the interface: semantic-pragmatic strategies for facilitating conversation with children with developmental disabilities. In: Depraetere I, Salkie R (eds) Drawing a line. Perspectives on the semantics-pragmatics interface. Springer, Cham, pp 00–01, 2016), I focus on how pragmatic impairment and strategies to improve pragmatic behaviour contribute to our understanding of the semantics-pragmatics interface. I argue that the two main points papers like theirs show are the following: first, in studying pragmatics, we cannot purely rely on competence, but we have to take into account performance, that is, actual behaviour; second, there is no straightforward subsequency relation between semantics and pragmatics: pragmatics intervenes before and after semantics.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schaden, G. (2017). Appropriate Pragmatic Behaviour: Response to Foster-Cohen and Wong. In Logic, Argumentation and Reasoning (Vol. 11, pp. 183–196). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6_11

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free