Exploring occupation-based practice among occupational therapists in hospitals and rehabilitation institutions

4Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: While occupational therapists value occupation-based practice, they appear to spend less time on this approach and more time on impairment-based practices. Several barriers are reported for the occupation-based approach. Aim: To explore different aspects of occupation-based practice among occupational therapists working in hospitals and rehabilitation institutions, and to examine associations between sociodemographic factors, barriers, and occupation-based practice. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted. Participants were occupational therapists working in hospitals and rehabilitation institutions in Norway. The data were analysed with descriptive statistics and logistic regression. Results: The therapists (n = 124) valued occupation-based practice and reported using it frequently and to a large extent. Relatively small proportions of their practice (26% assessments and 38% interventions) were classified as occupation-based. Lack of time, space and equipment were reported as large barriers. Lack of time and lack of equipment were associated with low self-reported level of occupation-based practice. Conclusions: The participants valued occupation-based practice, while the reported assessment and intervention methods were mainly not occupation-based. Several barriers were reported, and some were associated with less use of occupation-based practice. Significance: The results can be used to raise awareness of occupational therapists’ use of occupation-based practice and barriers to this approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aas, M. H., & Bonsaksen, T. (2023). Exploring occupation-based practice among occupational therapists in hospitals and rehabilitation institutions. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 30(7), 1074–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/11038128.2022.2059564

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free