Impact of turbulence modeling on the simulation of blood flow in aortic coarctation

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Numerical simulations of pulsatile blood flow in an aortic coarctation require the use of turbulence modeling. This paper considers three models from the class of large eddy simulation (LES) models (Smagorinsky, Vreman, (Formula presented.) -model) and one model from the class of variational multiscale models (residual-based) within a finite element framework. The influence of these models on the estimation of clinically relevant biomarkers used to assess the degree of severity of the pathological condition (pressure difference, secondary flow degree, normalized flow displacement, wall shear stress) is investigated in detail. The simulations show that most methods are consistent in terms of severity indicators such as pressure difference and stenotic velocity. Moreover, using second-order velocity finite elements, different turbulence models might lead to considerably different results concerning other clinically relevant quantities such as wall shear stresses. These differences may be attributed to differences in numerical dissipation introduced by the turbulence models.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Katz, S., Caiazzo, A., Moreau, B., Wilbrandt, U., Brüning, J., Goubergrits, L., & John, V. (2023). Impact of turbulence modeling on the simulation of blood flow in aortic coarctation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 39(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3695

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free